Medieval Crossbows: History, Technology and Legacy of a Weapon that Changed War

What was a medieval crossbow and why did its mere presence change the pulse of battle? Imagine the tense calm before an assault: on the walls, a crossbowman prepares his instrument, tightening the string between wooden or metal limbs, while in the field knights seek a target that is often no longer safe from the invisible bolt that crosses the distance. This article explores the medieval crossbow from its origin to its legacy: design, loading mechanisms, tactics, social myths, and how to interpret its replicas today.

Why the Crossbow Marked an Era

The crossbow was not a simple variation of the bow: it was a war machine that condensed power, control, and accessibility. While the longbow required years of training and a body hardened by practice, the crossbow offered infantry and tower defenders a system that, with less preparation, turned a common soldier into a lethal threat. Throughout this text you will learn how it was built, why complex loading mechanisms were developed, what role it played in medieval campaigns, and how its image — sometimes demonized — has historical and cultural roots.

The Crossbow: Historical Journey from its Origins to the Present

The crossbow originated in ancient China and, over more than two millennia, spread, evolved, and provoked military and religious debates in Eurasia. From the first repeating models to its coexistence with bows and, later, with firearms, the crossbow maintained constant constructive elements that made it one of the longest-lasting mechanical weapons.

Era	Event
Origins in China and early developments (5th–4th centuries BC — 2nd century AD)
5th Century BC	Documented origin of the crossbow in China; its invention is attributed to a man named Chi’in in the middle of this century. Early forms are found in archaeological contexts.
5th–4th Centuries BC	Discovery in Tomb 47 of Qinjiazui (Hubei province) of a repeating crossbow attributed to the Spring and Autumn Period.
181–234 AD	Zhuge Liang improves the design of the repeating crossbow by creating the nu-liano, capable of firing two or three arrows simultaneously.
High Middle Ages (6th–10th centuries)
6th–7th Centuries AD	In Christian Western Europe, archaeological evidence of the use of bows appears (arrowheads associated with Merovingian tombs).
10th Century	Documented reappearance of the crossbow in Europe: it appears in the Bible of the French monk Haimo and in manuscripts from the end of this century. In Islamic contexts (Calatalifa, Madrid) the first tanged and socketed arrowheads appear (10th–11th centuries).
Late 11th Century — 12th Century: expansion, iconography, and ecclesiastical regulations
1066	Battle of Hastings: it is possible that William the Conqueror used crossbows; bolt heads were found at the site.
1086	First reference to the crossbow in Spain in the engraving of the Beato del Burgo de Osma and in the paintings of San Baudelio de Berlanga (Soria).
Late 11th c. — early 12th c.	Coexistence of bow and crossbow in Al-Andalus (Zafranales site): arrowheads and bolts are found along with a bone crossbow nut. Capital of Saint Sernin (Toulouse) represents a demon cocking a crossbow (symbol of a “devilish” weapon).
12th Century	Widespread use of the crossbow in Christian kingdoms (diffusion in the peninsula). The bow is almost restricted to hunting in Christian kingdoms, while in Al-Andalus the bow continues to be promoted for warlike uses by religious doctrine. The use of the stirrup-loading begins (general incorporation in Europe confirmed in the 13th c.).
1139	Second Lateran Council: the Church prohibits the use of the crossbow against Christians, considering it an excessively dangerous and cruel weapon.
1143	Papal confirmation: Pope Innocent II reconfirms the prohibition against the use of crossbows against Christians, threatening crossbowmen, manufacturers, and merchants with excommunication.
Late 12th Century — late 13th Century: conflicts and technical evolution
12th Century (various milestones)	Use of crossbows in sieges and battles (e.g., siege of Gibraltar); appearance of representations of crossbowmen (Cloister of Santo Domingo de Silos) and archaeological finds of crossbow nuts in castles such as Torre Grossa de Jijona, El Castellar de Alcoy, and Calatrava la Vieja. Projectile points with tubular sockets documented until the late 12th century and early 13th century.
1195	Battle of Alarcos: confrontation between Castilian and Almohad troops; Alarcos castle participates in the warlike context of the battle.
1196	Siege of the fortress of Castro de los Judíos (documentary news).
1199	Death of Richard the Lionheart: mortal wound caused by an arrow/crossbow bolt in the siege of Chêlus (France).
1212	Battle of Las Navas de Tolosa: often considered the introduction of the crossbow to the peninsula by European crusaders, although iconography and earlier sources show it present since the 11th century.
13th–14th Centuries: refinements, local regulations, and coexistence with archers
Early 13th c.	Mention of more powerful “cervera” crossbows, with limbs reinforced with bone or horn following recurve models from Al-Andalus; engravings with wavy limbs appear. Evolution of the European shield linked to new tactics.
Second half 13th c.	Spread of the English longbow (during the Welsh wars and in later conflicts), which would gain prominence in England against the crossbow.
1288–1290	1288: fuero of Puebla de Acocer. 1290: Toledo City Council confirms and extends the fuero and obliges crossbowmen to maintain their crossbows in good condition.
12th–14th Centuries	Widespread use of the crossbow in Spain and Western Europe; it remained a relevant weapon in infantry and sieges.
Second half 14th c.	Evidence of the cranequin (rack-and-pinion mechanism) as a system for tensioning the crossbow string.
1366–1369	First Castilian Civil War: intervention of English longbowmen serving Edward of England, supporter of Pedro I.
1367	Battle of Nájera: some 5,500 English archers demonstrate great effectiveness against French crossbowmen.
14th Century	Extension in the Iberian Peninsula of the use of gunpowder and ballistic artillery (Chinese origin, introduced by Muslims in rudimentary form).
15th Century — transition to the era of firearms
1418–1450	Reign of Sejong the Great in Korea: introduction of the chu-ko-nu (sunogung) after observing it in China.
1422–1461	Reign of Charles VII of France: formation of specialized teams of trained crossbowmen, with units that numbered some 6,000 men. 1448–1450: creation of the Company of the Frankish Archers, perhaps the first professional French army.
15th Century	The gradual displacement of the crossbow by firearms begins; the crossbow remained present, and some monarchs (e.g., Francis I) maintained crossbow units for their security well into the century.
Late Modern Era, 19th Century and Present
1894–1895	First Sino-Japanese War: the chu-ko-nu is last documented as a common weapon among Manchurian troops (photographs of the time).
Present	The crossbow is mainly used for hunting, sport, and collecting; some residual military uses persist. The basic construction of the repeating crossbow has largely remained unchanged, being considered a precursor to modern automatic weapons such as the 19th-century Gatling gun.

How a Medieval Crossbow Was Built: Anatomy and Materials

The crossbow is a synthesis of materials and mechanical solutions. Its main parts are simple to list, but each allowed for regional and temporal variations that affected power and tactical use.

Essential Parts

• Limbs or staves: initially wood and horn, with bone reinforcements; in later developments, metal was used for more powerful limbs.
• Tiller or stock: carved wood that aligned the projectile and housed the nut and trigger.
• Nut: a piece that held the tensioned string until the trigger released it.
• Trigger (or release): firing mechanism that released the string and allowed the bolt to be fired.
• String and bolt: the string evolved from gut to wire and, finally, to synthetic fibers; the bolt evolved into metal quarrels capable of piercing chainmail.

Woods, Horns, and Metal: The Search for Power

The combination of layers of wood with tendons and horn reinforcements provided efficient recurved limbs. “Cervera” crossbows reinforced with bone or horn followed designs that increased stored energy and, therefore, bolt velocity. With the introduction of metal limbs and windlass or cranequin systems, power soared.

Loading Mechanisms: Ingenuity to Overcome Resistance

The string tension was the limiting factor: the higher the tension, the greater the firing energy, but the greater the difficulty of loading. Hence, innovations focused on loading assistance systems.

Main Types of Loading

• By hand or with claw: primitive systems where the crossbowman used his strength or a simple tool to tension the string.
• Stirrup: the crossbowman placed his foot in a front stirrup to incorporate leg and torso strength. It appeared in Europe and became popular between the 12th–13th centuries.
• Cranequin (rack and pinion windlass): a crank that multiplied force; allowed very powerful limbs to be tensioned at the cost of slower reloading.
• Windlass and pulleys: massive systems that required a frame and several hands to tension; they were used in the defense of fortifications and siege engines due to their enormous power.

Types of Crossbows and their Tactical Role

There is no single medieval crossbow: models varied by power, reloading speed, and purpose. Below we show a comparative table that facilitates seeing key differences between representative types.

Type	Limb Length (approx.)	Era	Tactical Use
Hand Crossbow (two feet)	30–60 cm	10th–12th Centuries	Light infantry; fast reloading but lower power.
Stirrup Crossbow	50–80 cm	12th–14th Centuries	Versatile: good compromise between power and ease of use.
Cranequin Crossbow	60–90 cm	Second half 14th c.	High power for wall defense and armored targets.
Windlass Crossbow (pulley windlass)	70–100+ cm	14th–15th Centuries	Used in sieges and defensive emplacements; maximum penetration at the cost of slowness.

Hand Crossbow (two feet)

• Limb Length: 30–60 cm (approx.)
• Era: 10th–12th Centuries
• Tactical Use: Light infantry; fast reloading but lower power.

Stirrup Crossbow

• Limb Length: 50–80 cm (approx.)
• Era: 12th–14th Centuries
• Tactical Use: Versatile: good compromise between power and ease of use.

The Bolt, the Quarrel, and the Science of Penetration

Crossbow projectiles were not simply shorter arrows: their robust points were designed to transfer energy to a narrow point that would break mail and pierce leather or sheet metal. Pyramidal or rhomboidal points concentrated the force; broadheads sought to tear. The evolution towards metal points with tubular or tanged sockets improved adjustability and impact resistance.

Factors Determining Penetration

• Initial Velocity: depends on the tension and elasticity of the limbs and the mass of the quarrel.
• Quarrel Mass and Point Design: heavier quarrels retain impact energy; hardened and sharpened points facilitate penetration.
• Angle and Distance: perpendicular impacts at short-medium range maximized effectiveness.

Myths, Church, and the “Diabolical” Reputation of the Crossbow

The severe ecclesiastical condemnation against the use of crossbows in combat between Christians (Second Lateran Council, 1139) was not merely a moral reaction: it was a response to a transformation of the battlefield. The crossbow allowed soldiers of low origin to inflict lethal damage on noble cavalry without the devastating training required by the bow. This democratization of lethality altered the social order that chivalric warfare maintained.

Reality or Exaggeration?

Religious and literary sources of the time used moral and symbolic language. While there was concern about its use against Christians, the weapon continued to be used in sieges, city defense, and skirmishes; kingdoms also adopted it for its strategic utility.

Crossbow vs. Bow: The Eternal Tactical Debate

Comparing crossbow and bow is not just measuring power and rate of fire. It is comparing logistical models: the archer is mobile, fast-paced, and requires rigorous training; the crossbowman can be trained quickly, is more accurate due to his sight, and keeps the string tensioned until firing.

• Rate of Fire: expert archer: up to 10 arrows/min; crossbowman with heavy crossbow: 1 bolt/min (although there are exceptions such as the chu-ko-nu in Asia).
• Power: crossbows with windlass or cranequin surpassed many bows in power, being capable of piercing chainmail and plates at considerable distances.
• Logistical Profile: the crossbow required replacement parts (strings, nuts, bolts) and, in the most powerful models, human support to load; the archer depended on the soldier’s own training and health.

The Chu-ko-nu: The Crossbow that Changes the Rule of Pace

In China, a variant appeared that broke the power/rate dichotomy: the chu-ko-nu, a repeating crossbow that combined a bolt magazine with a lever mechanism. Although its power was lower, its rate of fire allowed rapid projectiles to be concentrated on exposed targets, an ingenious solution that survived as a utilitarian weapon until modern times.

Tactical Use: Where the Crossbow Shines

Crossbows were especially effective in:

• Defense of walls and towers: precision and short-range power made them lethal against assaults and escalations.
• Sieges: entrenched firing from embrasures or elevated platforms.
• Skirmishes: when heavy ammunition was needed to neutralize cavalry or stop charges.

Maintenance, Assembly, and Safety

A crossbow was also a sensitive instrument: the strings had to be greased and tensioned, the limbs free of cracks, and the nut adjusted. Poor maintenance could cause catastrophic failures: breakages in the launching spoon or fractures in the limb that would injure the crossbowman. For this reason, specialized crossbowmen not only fired but also maintained and repaired their weapons.

Modern Replicas, Use in Reenactment, and Regulations

Today there are historical replicas and sports crossbows. Replicas seek aesthetic and functional fidelity, but it is important to distinguish between an exhibition replica and a functional model designed for shooting or hunting. The laws of each country regulate their use; in many places, hunting crossbows are subject to specific permits.

Replicas and Models: What to Look for in a Faithful Reproduction

If you are interested in a replica of a medieval crossbow, look for precision in the details: carved stock, functional nut, adequate reproduction of limbs and bolts. A well-made replica conveys real sensations of the era and allows for a better understanding of the weapon’s ergonomics and limitations.

Quick Comparison for Collectors and Reenactors

Aspect	Historical Replica	Modern Sport Model
Fidelity	High: historical materials and aesthetics	Medium–low: ergonomics and composite materials are prioritized
Safety	Depends on the manufacturer; may require usage limitations	High: modern safety systems and plasticized material
Maintenance	High: wood, horn, and tendon require care	Low: more resistant synthetic materials

Historical Replica

• Fidelity: High
• Maintenance: High
• Recommended Use: Exhibition and controlled reenactment

Modern Sport Model

• Fidelity: Medium–low
• Maintenance: Low
• Recommended Use: Shooting and hunting where permitted by regulations

Lessons the Crossbow Teaches the Enthusiast and the Researcher

The medieval crossbow forced a rethinking of war and technology: it taught that mechanics and organization can equal brute force, that an improvement in the loading system changes tactics, and that technology, by itself, conditions social and moral norms. For the researcher, its remains — points, nuts, iconographic representations — are key to reconstructing war techniques and trade networks in the Middle Ages.

Archaeological Sources and Key Finds

Fragments recovered from castles, necropolises, and Islamic and Christian sites allow tracing the spread of techniques. Tubular or tanged points, nuts found in fortresses, and representations in capitals or codices are small witnesses to a technology that adapted to different theaters of war.

A Final Look at the Legacy

The crossbow did not disappear due to immediate obsolescence; it was gradually supplanted by new technology (firearms) that also changed tactics, logistics, and norms. Nevertheless, the crossbow left an indelible mark: it democratized long-range damage, spurred mechanical innovation, and left a material and cultural legacy that is today reconstructed in museums, collections, and replicas.

SEE MORE MEDIEVAL CROSSBOWS | SEE MORE MEDIEVAL WEAPONS